Independent verification of Pakistani suppliers and counterparties — registry filings obtained in person, Urdu-language adverse media, district court records, and site assessment. The work no database can do from a desk in New York or Rotterdam.
Based in Lahore. Engaged directly by US and European importers, brands, banks and payment firms. Sample report available on request, produced entirely from public sources.
Pakistan has no publicly searchable central register of beneficial ownership. Ownership must be verified with the counterparty directly or by formal disclosure request. No global screening database can answer it for you.
SECP · position as at 2026US detentions exceeded 8,000 shipments in 2025, against $3.8bn of cargo. The Entity List expanded to 187 entities in August 2026. There is no de minimis exception — a single traced input anywhere in the chain is enough.
CBP · DHS Forced Labor Enforcement Task ForceCotton apparel is a CBP priority category, and the EU Forced Labour Regulation bites from December 2027. Pakistan now imports most of its lint and blends it — so a factory-gate claim proves nothing about the fibre.
CBP priority sectors · EU GSP+ assessmentPriced per counterparty, quoted before work begins. No retainer required to start, and no charge if the entity cannot be identified on the register. Reports are prepared to support UFLPA rebuttal documentation and EU due diligence obligations.
Fees quoted in USD. GBP and EUR invoicing available on request. Findings are delivered as analysis and verified conclusions. Registry documents are obtained for the client's own customer due diligence purpose and are not resold as a data product.
Most due diligence on Pakistani counterparties is produced by analysts who have never been to Pakistan, working from databases that were never built to cover it. The result reads well and verifies almost nothing.
My background is engineering and quality management across pharmaceutical and healthcare, real estate operations, software, and supply chain management on large infrastructure programmes. Quality management is the discipline of verifying that a process does what it claims — on site, against evidence. Counterparty diligence is the same job asked about a different subject.
Some of that infrastructure work sat inside Chinese contracting structures. For a client tracing exposure through those structures, that is a research advantage rather than a relationship: I know how subcontracting layers and documentation practice actually behave, which is what makes the gaps findable.
Method. Every engagement is recorded against a consistent evidentiary schema. Each finding is tied to a named source, and the basis of every ownership claim is stated explicitly — registered, declared, inferred, or observed. Those are three different claims, and conflating them is the most common defect in diligence on this market.
Independence. I hold no ownership, agency or commercial interest in any counterparty I report on. Any prior involvement with a subject or its affiliates is disclosed in writing before an engagement begins, and I decline engagements where a conflict cannot be managed.
This is a single-practitioner practice by design. Engagements are taken selectively, work is not subcontracted, and every report carries my name. For volumes beyond that capacity, I will say so rather than dilute the work.
A complete Standard-tier report on a listed Pakistani manufacturer, produced entirely from public sources. It shows the structure, the standard of evidence, and — more usefully — exactly which findings can only be obtained inside Pakistan.
Sent by return email, usually within a few hours. No follow-up sequence, no newsletter.
Or email hannan@hannanshoukat.com directly, or call +92 315 745 6388. Enquiries are answered by me, not an assistant.